Browsing All posts tagged under »preponderance of the evidence«

“I Reckon”: The Standard of Proof Applied by Judges to Restraining Order Cases

September 30, 2016

2

As the story goes, civil restraining orders are awarded to plaintiffs who demonstrate by a “preponderance of the evidence” that they need one. According to this story, a judge determines by actuarial science that there’s a 51% or greater probability that the petitioner’s need is valid, that is, that s/he’s representing some facts and his […]