Tiffany Bredfeldt, a toxicologist employed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the EPA who testified before the Arizona Superior Court in 2013 that she was in psychiatric care, has accused the writer to, in her own words, “the Court multiple times [and] to multiple police departments, detectives, federal agencies, and other officials in several states,” including the Arizona Dept. of Public Safety and the FBI. The writer knew Bredfeldt for three months in 2005, in and around his own home, where she “would not wear a wedding ring,” and he has had no contact with her since March 2006. All of her post-2006 allegations, which have included charges of sexual trespass/assault and which have corroded more than a decade of the writer’s life, were this month invalidated. Coincident with the conclusion of the case, Tiffany Bredfeldt was apparently dumped by her husband.
TCEQ senior toxicologist Tiffany Bredfeldt, who lied to the court and law enforcement for over a decade, represented as the monster I believe her to be
“Defendant Greene agrees not to use the following terms and/or phrases in reference to Plaintiff [Tiffany] Bredfeldt, unless and until these words become true: perjurer, felon, felonious conduct, criminal, fraud or fraudulent within her profession, narcissistic personality disorder, [or] adulteress….”
—Bredfeldt v. Greene, June 26, 2018 settlement agreement
Consenting to the foregoing clause in a “voluntary” settlement with a woman who has accused me broadly since 2006—and twice attempted to have me jailed in recent years for exercising my First Amendment liberties—was a compromise I had to make to gain the substantive dissolution of an illegal speech injunction, or “prior restraint,” that she coerced in 2013 from a since disgraced superior court judge, Carmine Cornelio, that literally prohibited me from speaking…at all.
(Cornelio was shamed off the bench in 2016. Put politely, he declined to face voters after being roundly panned by the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review. Put plainly, he abused the power entrusted to him and, what’s far more extraordinary, was held to account for it.)
When judges violate the Constitution—and other judges affirm the violation despite, for example, contrary arguments by a renowned constitutional scholar—a settlement agreement like that quoted above is the recourse of last resort.
In contrast to my concessions, which were relatively minor, my accuser of over a decade had to consent to this:
Plaintiff agrees not to pursue any criminal charges against Defendant for any conduct by Defendant before the date of this Settlement Agreement.
And:
Plaintiff agrees that her execution of this Settlement Agreement constitutes a release of any and all claims which she may have or claim against the Defendant, whether known or unknown, which in any way arise out of or are connected to Defendant’s actions occurring before the date of this Settlement Agreement.
This doesn’t of course mean her accusations, which exist in at least four different police agencies’ and at least three different courts’ public records, will be shredded; it just means the gag is now on the other face.
My accuser is expressly prohibited from making false or frivolous accusations to law enforcement officials, and any further allegations she wishes to bring at court must pass muster with “a single arbitrator who shall be a practicing attorney, retired judge, or law school professor with at least ten years of total working experience as such and with experience in First Amendment law.”
She’s also obligated to schlep herself from Texas to Tucson where her mendacious accusations began 12 years ago.
Copyright © 2018 RestrainingOrderAbuse.com
*I was granted the services of a public defender in 2016, because my accuser demanded that I be jailed. Otherwise the cost to me of realizing an equitable revision of an injunction grounded on judicial abuse of power would easily have exceeded $50,000. Who footed the actual bill, including expenses incurred by law enforcement and the courts? If you’re an Arizona taxpayer, you did. (Also to thank for that is Michael Honeycutt, Ph.D., toxicology director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and Scott Pruitt’s selection for chairman of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board. Honeycutt presented misleading testimony to the court in 2013 on my accuser’s behalf.) Good thing Arizona didn’t need those tens of thousands of dollars for education or low-income housing or the legal representation of immigrant children taken from their families and confined in cages. Rock on, #MeToo. You go, “social justice crusaders.”
**What follows is a synopsis of statements Texas state official and EPA adviser Tiffany Bredfeldt gave in evidence to the court or, in one instance, to the police only between the years 2006 and 2017.
TALKING BACK to restraining orders 
Oops, that was supposed to be a reply to the long and informative comment you left in response to the last comment I made. Also, I had broken my previous comment down into four paragraphs and I’m sorry that it is all together like that. My apologies.
LikeLike
In March of 2016, 3 months after I broke up her and the restraining order got put in place, I did file a small claims case against her and had her served by a process server who is licensed. She filed a response that claimed that I have 16 pending charges against me from the city attorney, which at that point I thought was a lie because I never knew of any charges. I was only aware of the one time I got arrested in 2015 after a domestic violence incident in which charges were never filed because the only person with injuries was me. That incident cost $10,000 total. $5000 for bail, and $5000 for the attorney, so I was suing her for that $10,000. She filed an answer which I received in the mail shortly afterwards. She was trying to get the entire case dismissed and she used the 16 made up charges as the reason but said she would be willing to settle for being able to appear by telephone or satellite because she was afraid to be in the same courtroom as me. Before I could file that answer the police came to my house and arrested me on the 16 charges. The bail was $100,000. I just couldn’t believe it, my entire life was being destroyed and all I was able to do was sit back and watch while it happened. I made bail and filed my answer. Her request was denied based on the evidence I submitted with my answer and the small claims date was set. At the small claims court house she put on quite a show and was accompanied by five sheriffs because I was “so dangerous” and she “feared for her life”. Since she was an attorney she said exactly what she needed to say to make me look as bad as possible. She used the fact that I was out on bail at the time to her advantage. I had stacks and stacks of papers proving that I was never violent and that she was sick. I had recording’s, Voice Mail’s, security video, text message, I even had a witness who is somebody who I hardly even knew but lived in my building and saw her hitting me. The same exact evidence I had at the final restraining order hearing that the judge never bothered looking at. Well, the case was dismissed without prejudice, Which to my understanding basically means that I had to take care of the criminal stuff first and then I can take the case back to small claims court. This was April of 2016 and The criminal case just ended in December 2017. I got the transcripts from the trial In May 2018. What would you do if you were in my situation, Todd? You seem to have all the knowledge of a lawyer without the liability and greed of one. If you were me, what would you do?
LikeLike
I’ve stood on principle, but I’ve stood on it for 12 years while everything around me has decayed, so I would advise you to consider the strength of your case and your willingness to go on fighting. I can tell you that people like this woman have no scruples, and they don’t second-guess themselves or have moral awakenings. If the court has found that she abused process (that is, that none of her claims were deemed to have any merit), then I think you have a good chance of recovering your costs, which were hardly petty. Proving damages beyond costs, though, would be tough and would require witness testimony (e.g., therapist, doctor, friends and family). You might consider moving for a jury trial if you wanted to include torts like intentional infliction of emotional distress. I have heard about someone getting a settlement from local PD for false imprisonment. Two years later. Be aware that a lawsuit means unrelenting stress for the better part 12 months, at least, and that you have to be on your toes to meet all filing deadlines. If you decide to prosecute one or more lawsuits, definitely get an attorney’s help if you can. It’s possible you could induce a settlement conference with this woman. In my state, if you’re suing for less than $50,000, I think it’s mandatory. Also, the protective order probably could be vacated (and sealed/expunged) with her cooperation. So there are good motives for taking action. You just have to be prepared to accept the tolls.
LikeLike
Finally! And yes, congratulations for hanging in there and sticking it out when things looked gloomy for you but you never gave up the faith in good ol’ 1A.
LikeLike
Thanks, Larry. Bruce told me you lost one of your little bear-baiters. I was sorry to hear it.
LikeLike
This is amazing, congratulations! How did you manage to make this happen? I was in a very similar situation, and still am. Except, My accuser was successful in having me thrown in jail. 3 times as a matter of fact. I went to trial for all of her her accusations last December and was found not guilty of all the charges. There is still a restraining order in place though which is stressing me out more than ever because I’m afraid of the cycle repeating again. You can read more about my story from this reddit post I made https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8xm5s7/falsely_accused_refused_plea_deal_and_went_to/
What did you do to make all the stuff you talked about in this post actually happen?
LikeLike
I provoked some reptiles to bite. Four legal actions were initiated against me back to back in the first four months of 2016—a coordinated attack by two women who resented what I said about them. Two of the actions were criminal prosecutions, one based on false allegations to the police; the other based on the alleged violation of an illegal speech injunction issued in 2013 (see above).
(There was a man involved, too, the husband of the woman this post is about—his name is Phil Bredfeldt—but he’s just a pathetic slack thing, a puppet.)
Civil “abuse” actions are hard to fight if you can’t afford representation. When someone’s demanding your incarceration, though, and you resist, judges will appoint you counsel if it makes their job easier. Nuts and bolts: file motion after motion after motion. See here for that:
https://restrainingorderabuse.com/2018/04/09/one-way-to-convince-a-judge-to-appoint-you-free-legal-counsel/
So unlike in previous years, I had lawyers in 2016. One of the women who accused me, the trashier of the two—her name is Jen (Oas-)Terpstra—backed out of two actions. In the third she was represented by the sleazy attorney hired by the other woman, Tiffany Bredfeldt. He milked the job. I got this case dismissed on my own. Here’s a post about it with audio from a judge:
https://restrainingorderabuse.com/2018/01/10/presiding-tucson-city-court-judge-antonio-riojas-acknowledges-restraining-orders-are-abused-by-people-who-say-things-that-are-just-blatantly-false/
Remember, what I’ve described spans a decade in its entirety, and that’s a decade of experience and advice from knowledgeable people that I didn’t have in 2006.
Just the contempt charge, which this post is about, was two years of fighting: a half dozen motions to the superior court, appointment of counsel, six months of delays from court reporters, the disappearance of the first lawyer I was appointed, starting fresh with a new lawyer, an appeal including an amicus brief from Prof. Eugene Volokh of the UCLA School of Law, rejection of the appeal, return to superior court, insistence by the superior court judge that I attend a settlement conference….
The most basic answer to your question is that high-conflict people love it when they’re winning but have no courage or stamina. Trash can’t be courageous.
When things turn against them, it’s not fun anymore. They get tired and quit.
Compare the confidence of these signatures.
LikeLike
The signature really does reveal a lot. Interesting.
LikeLike
Also I had voodoo working for me.
Your case sounds pretty extreme. I’d be glad to write about it if you’d like. Have you considered suing for abuse of process?
LikeLike
OK. I read the advice you’ve been given. I would say don’t bother with filing a complaint while you’re subject to a court order. You can file a lawsuit by yourself, though. It’s not that big a deal. A few hundred dollars. The injunction isn’t an impediment to filing a legal action. You just have to take care that service of papers doesn’t violate the injunction, i.e., don’t serve them in person, and do not include any kind of personal message with what you have served. If possible, see if a lawyer will at least talk to you. One might “coach” you who wouldn’t represent you.
LikeLike
Congratulations
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLike